The hard-top companion to the Boxster, using the later-revised M97 engine — a somewhat improved bearing design over the earliest M96 units, but still within the scope of the engine page's essential IMS checklist.
The Cayman's rigid, hard-top mid-engine chassis is widely regarded by enthusiasts as an even more focused driver's car than the related Boxster — the same M97 engine consideration from the engine page applies here regardless of the body style difference.
The M97's revised bearing design is a genuine, if partial, improvement over the earliest M96 units — still worth the full IMS checklist, but with somewhat more encouraging context than the earliest Boxster and 996 examples.
This is about the car itself — for engine-specific failure points, see the dedicated engine page below.
This Cayman is a defining application of the later-revised M97. The IMS bearing checklist on the dedicated engine page remains essential before buying, despite the revised design.
FULL ENGINE BREAKDOWNPorsche M96/M97 Flat-Six — Reliable or Not →This remains essential despite the revised bearing design: ask whether the IMS bearing has been proactively replaced, and get documentation if so.
Ask about rear main seal (RMS) leak history, a secondary but common concern on this generation.
Find a Porsche specialist rather than a generalist mechanic for any pre-purchase inspection, given how much depends on the IMS check.